Cars were not always the rulers of the roads. Just imagine how it would be is the car was not so totally dominant here in the States.
“To many urban Americans in the 1920s, the car and its driver were tyrants that deprived others of their freedom.”
City people saw the car not just as a menace to life and limb, but also as an aggressor upon their time-honored rights to city streets. “The pedestrian,” explained a Brooklyn man, “as an American citizen, naturally resents any intrusion upon his prior constitutional rights.” Custom and the Anglo-American legal tradition confirmed pedestrians’ inalienable right to the street. In Chicago in 1926, as in most cities, “nothing” in the law “prohibits a pedestrian from using any part of the roadway of any street or highway, at any time or at any place as he may desire.” So noted the author of a traffic survey commissioned by the Chicago Association of Commerce. According to Connecticut’s first Motor Vehicle Commissioner, Robbins Stoeckel, the most restrictive interpretation of pedestrians’ rights was that “All travelers have equal rights on the highway.”
I might have posted this before, but it kinda touches on this from another view.
It’s the cars, stupid. Why we must restrict cars to save our cities
“When you next walk around your town or city, look around at the space we dedicate to cars. When you next press what has been nicknamed the ‘beg button’ to allow you the luxury of crossing from one side of the road to another, have a think about why those travelling alone in a metal cocoon belching out poisonous fumes have priority over you.”
